If inspection landed tomorrow, what colour is your evidence?
This is a pressure test for the thing that actually gets challenged: pullability. Not "we do this" — here's the trail. Nine honest answers give you a Green, Amber or Red — in report-card format, the way the toolkits now grade you.
Green — pullable in seconds. Clear patterns, clean exports.
Amber — the proof exists, but it's scattered and fragile.
Red — a scramble: folders, screenshots, "we'll pull it together".
Which one are you? 9 questions →
Scored against the November 2025 toolkits
Run the check
Can you pull this proof
on demand?
Answer honestly. Yes means you can pull it quickly and consistently, by cohort or centre, without hunting.
You can show engagement and participation patterns by cohort or centre — not just "overall".
You can evidence activity-level engagement — not just completion — across learning tasks.
You can export a clean report leaders can use immediately — QIP, audits, inspection.
You can spot drift early — who's disengaging — and evidence what you did next.
You can show impact after intervention — before and after — not just that support "exists".
Evidence is consistent across cohorts and centres — not dependent on individual staff habits.
Learners demonstrate applied decision-making — choices, habits, safer actions — not just recall.
Learner voice is captured safely — structured reflections, without inviting oversharing or risk.
You can show progress over time — not one-offs — in a trail leaders can pull quickly.
Prefer email? Send CHECK + School / FE / ITP to owais@fledglings.co and we'll reply with the "exact pulls" list.
Ready when you are
Turn your colour
into a plan.
A short, honest 15 minutes: we'll pressure-test your trail, pinpoint the weak spot, and map exactly what to pull for leaders and inspection conversations.
Multi-centre? Bring one cohort — we'll show how to make evidence consistent everywhere.